DijitalPi
TREN
Contact
Home/ AI Solutions
IT security · Scope and volume to be determined during discovery

AI System for Preparing User Access Reviews

We design an AI system that reviews identity, role, application and recent-use records with source and time information. The system prepares an access review draft, but does not carry out technical, security or access decisions. If an account is privileged or shared, the system leaves the outcome open for the application owner to assess the evidence.

Representative access control operations panel with a work queue, checks and an audit trail: user access review queue
User access review queue Representative interface — contains no real data. Identities are masked. The panel does not grant, remove or change access roles.

The problem

In day-to-day operations, identity, role, application and recent-use records arrive through different systems and event records, preventing the team from seeing the case on a single timeline.

As a result, source links can be lost while the access review draft is prepared, the case can be routed to the wrong team, and the basis for the technical decision can remain unclear.

An incomplete workflow may overlook a privileged or shared account, while an incorrect system action could remove necessary access or leave excessive access in place.

What we set out to improve

  • Time taken for the access review draft to be ready for specialist review
  • Correct referral of records involving privileged or shared accounts to the appropriate specialist queue
  • Record of recommendations corrected or rejected by the application owner

How the system works

  1. 01 Retrieve identity, role, application and recent-use records from authorised sources
  2. 02 Verify the source, timestamp and record identifier
  3. 03 Add the relevant asset, user, shop, vehicle or content context
  4. 04 Prepare the access review draft
  5. 05 Compare the draft with technical rules and authority boundaries
  6. 06 Check for exceptions: a privileged or shared account
  7. 07 Obtain the application owner's approval, correction or rejection
  8. 08 Write the input, recommendation, changes and final decision to the audit log

Methods we used

  • Source- and time-traceable data extraction for identity, role, application and recent-use records
  • Structured output that restricts the access review draft fields to technical rules
  • An exception gate that separates privileged or shared accounts from system action
  • An authorised queue that presents the evidence and recommendation together for the application owner
  • Duplicate-processing controls and a rollback record to address the risk of removing necessary access or leaving excessive access in place

Where people stay involved

The application owner is the final decision-maker. If an account is privileged or shared, the workflow stops and the evidence is referred to the specialist queue. The system does not make blocking, access-change, technical intervention or physical action decisions on its own.

Data and security

Only fields required for the task are processed from identity, role, application and recent-use records. Source-system permissions are preserved, and unnecessary personal, technical and security-sensitive data is minimised before being sent to the model. Every retrieval, recommendation, human change and target-system action is written to the audit log.

Who this suits

A good fit

  • Teams that conduct recurring IT security reviews
  • Companies with defined source ownership and approval responsibility
  • Organisations that want exceptions to remain under human oversight

Not a good fit

  • Organisations whose source data is not current
  • Operations without a designated decision-maker and rollback process
  • Operations where the existing method is sufficient for the low volume

Frequently asked questions

What data is used?

Identity, role, application and recent-use records are used. The exact connections, fields and retention limits are determined during the access review.

How are exceptions handled?

If an account is privileged or shared, the workflow stops. The record is referred to the application owner's queue with its source evidence.

Does the system act on its own?

No. Because of the risk of removing necessary access or leaving excessive access in place, the final technical, security or access decision remains with a person; the recommendation and decision are recorded separately.

Project led by:DijitalPi

✦ PI ASSISTANT · ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

online

Ask the DijitalPi AI Assistant your question

No need to fill in a form and wait for a reply — write your question and let Pi, trained on DijitalPi's 20 years of know-how, answer within seconds.

  • Instant answers, 24/7
  • Service-specific context — no generic replies
  • Can connect you to a free consultation if you wish
Hi! 👋 I'm Pi — DijitalPi's AI assistant. Write whatever you'd like to know about AI System for Preparing User Access Reviews and I'll answer right away.

Pi Assistant answers are for information purposes; for a proposal get in touch.

ASK AI ABOUT DIJITALPI

Let an AI explain what DijitalPi does.

Opens your chosen assistant with a ready research prompt. It reads the site live and answers.