DijitalPi
TREN
Contact
Home/ AI Solutions
SaaS · Scope to be defined during discovery

Decision Support System for Reviewing Customer Churn Risk

We design an AI system that reviews permitted usage, support and subscription records together with their source and recency details. The system prepares an explainable review priority, but does not implement it as a final decision. If the account is new or usage is seasonal, the suggestion does not proceed; the customer success manager makes the final assessment.

Representative customer success analytics panel with a work queue, checks and an audit trail: customer review priority queue
Customer review priority queue Representative interface — contains no real data. Accounts use anonymous codes. The panel does not contact customers or make subscription decisions.

The problem

In day-to-day operations, permitted usage, support and subscription records arrive through different systems and files, preventing the team from reviewing the same case in one view.

As a result, the link to source evidence can be lost while an explainable review priority is prepared, leading to repeated checks and uncertainty about the basis for the decision.

Incomplete automation may overlook a new account or seasonal usage, while incorrect automation risks inappropriate and overly forceful communication.

What we set out to improve

  • Time taken for the explainable review priority draft to be ready for review
  • Correct routing of records involving a new account or seasonal usage to the appropriate specialist queue
  • Record of suggestions corrected or rejected by the customer success manager

How the system works

  1. 01 Retrieve permitted usage, support and subscription records from authorised sources
  2. 02 Verify the source system, record identifier and recency information
  3. 03 Map the fields to the target process schema
  4. 04 Prepare the explainable review priority draft
  5. 05 Compare the draft with business rules and source records
  6. 06 Check for an exception: a new account or seasonal usage
  7. 07 Have the customer success manager approve, revise or reject the suggestion
  8. 08 Write the input, suggestion, changes and final decision to the audit log

Methods we used

  • Source-traceable data extraction for permitted usage, support and subscription records
  • Structured output that limits the explainable review priority fields through business rules
  • An exception gate that separates cases involving a new account or seasonal usage
  • A queue that shows the customer success manager the source evidence and suggestion together
  • Duplicate-processing controls and a reversal record to reduce the risk of inappropriate and overly forceful communication

Where people stay involved

The customer success manager is the final decision-maker. The workflow pauses for a new account or seasonal usage and presents the case to the specialist with its supporting records. The specialist can revise or reject the suggestion, or stop the process.

Data and security

Only fields required for the task are processed from permitted usage, support and subscription records. Source-system permissions are preserved, and personal or commercially sensitive data is minimised before being passed to the model. Every read, suggestion, human change and write to the target system is logged.

Who this suits

A good fit

  • SaaS teams that perform repetitive reviews
  • Companies with defined ownership for sources and approvals
  • Organisations that want exceptions to remain under human supervision

Not a good fit

  • Operations where source data is not current
  • Operations where the decision owner and reversal process are not defined
  • Operations where the existing method is sufficient for the low volume

Frequently asked questions

What data is used?

Permitted usage, support and subscription records are used. The exact connections, fields and retention limits are defined during the access review.

How are exceptions handled?

The workflow pauses when an account is new or usage is seasonal. The record is placed in the customer success manager's queue with its source evidence.

How is incorrect automation controlled?

Because of the risk of inappropriate and overly forceful communication, no final action is taken without human approval. The source, suggestion and human decision are recorded separately.

Project led by:DijitalPi

✦ PI ASSISTANT · ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

online

Ask the DijitalPi AI Assistant your question

No need to fill in a form and wait for a reply — write your question and let Pi, trained on DijitalPi's 20 years of know-how, answer within seconds.

  • Instant answers, 24/7
  • Service-specific context — no generic replies
  • Can connect you to a free consultation if you wish
Hi! 👋 I'm Pi — DijitalPi's AI assistant. Write whatever you'd like to know about Decision Support System for Reviewing Customer Churn Risk and I'll answer right away.

Pi Assistant answers are for information purposes; for a proposal get in touch.

ASK AI ABOUT DIJITALPI

Let an AI explain what DijitalPi does.

Opens your chosen assistant with a ready research prompt. It reads the site live and answers.