DijitalPi
TREN
Contact
Home/ AI Solutions
Document operations · Scope to be determined during discovery

AI System for Classifying Documents by Type and Retention Rule

We design an AI system that reviews documents, sender details and filing plans together with source and recency information. The system prepares a document type and target repository recommendation but does not apply it as a final decision. If personal data is present or the document type is unclear, the recommendation does not proceed to action; the records manager makes the final assessment.

Representative records management panel with a work queue, checks and an audit trail: document type and retention queue
Document type and retention queue Representative interface — contains no real data. Document content is masked. The panel does not file records, start retention or perform disposal.

The problem

In day-to-day operations, documents, sender details and filing plans arrive in separate records and files, preventing the team from reviewing the same case in a single view.

As a result, the link to source evidence can be lost while preparing a document type and target repository recommendation, leading to repeated checks and uncertainty about the basis for the decision.

Incomplete automation may overlook cases involving personal data or an unclear document type, while poorly controlled automation risks inappropriate access and retention.

What we set out to improve

  • Time required to prepare a document type and target repository recommendation for review
  • Correct routing of records involving personal data or an unclear document type to the appropriate specialist queue
  • Recording of recommendations corrected or rejected by the records manager

How the system works

  1. 01 Retrieve document, sender and filing plan data from an authorised source
  2. 02 Verify the source system, record identifier and recency information
  3. 03 Transform the fields into the target process schema
  4. 04 Prepare a document type and target repository recommendation draft
  5. 05 Compare the draft with business rules and source records
  6. 06 Check for exceptions involving personal data or an unclear document type
  7. 07 Obtain the records manager's approval, correction or rejection
  8. 08 Write the input, recommendation, changes and final decision to the audit log

Methods we used

  • Source-traceable data extraction from documents, sender details and filing plans
  • Structured output that restricts document type and target repository recommendation fields through business rules
  • An exception gate that separates cases involving personal data or an unclear document type
  • A queue that shows the source and recommendation together for the records manager
  • Duplicate-processing controls and rollback records to mitigate the risk of inappropriate access and retention

Where people stay involved

The records manager makes the final decision. When personal data is present or the document type is unclear, the workflow stops and presents the supporting records to the specialist. The specialist can amend or reject the recommendation, or stop the process.

Data and security

Only the fields required for the task are processed from the document, sender details and filing plan. Source-system permissions remain in force, and personal or commercially sensitive data is minimised before being provided to the model. Every read, recommendation, human amendment and write to the target system is logged.

Who this suits

A good fit

  • Teams carrying out repetitive reviews in document operations
  • Companies with defined ownership for sources and approvals
  • Organisations that want exceptions to remain under human oversight

Not a good fit

  • Where source data is not current
  • Where the decision owner and rollback process are not defined
  • Where the existing method adequately handles the low volume

Frequently asked questions

What data is used?

Documents, sender details and filing plans are used. The exact connections, fields and retention boundaries are determined during the access review.

How are exceptions handled?

The workflow stops when personal data is present or the document type is unclear. The record goes to the records manager's queue with its source evidence.

How is the risk of incorrect automation controlled?

Because of the risk of inappropriate access and retention, no final action is taken without human approval. The source, recommendation and human decision are recorded separately.

Project led by:DijitalPi

✦ PI ASSISTANT · ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

online

Ask the DijitalPi AI Assistant your question

No need to fill in a form and wait for a reply — write your question and let Pi, trained on DijitalPi's 20 years of know-how, answer within seconds.

  • Instant answers, 24/7
  • Service-specific context — no generic replies
  • Can connect you to a free consultation if you wish
Hi! 👋 I'm Pi — DijitalPi's AI assistant. Write whatever you'd like to know about AI System for Classifying Documents by Type and Retention Rule and I'll answer right away.

Pi Assistant answers are for information purposes; for a proposal get in touch.

ASK AI ABOUT DIJITALPI

Let an AI explain what DijitalPi does.

Opens your chosen assistant with a ready research prompt. It reads the site live and answers.