DijitalPi
TREN
Contact
Home/ AI Solutions
Facility energy management · Consumption tracked by meter and department

AI System for Opening Energy Consumption Variances for Review

We design a system that compares consumption with production, weather and operating schedules, then prepares a variance file without changing equipment or operating settings. The workflow checks meter consumption, production volume, shift, outdoor weather, department and maintenance records together with their sources, then prepares a consumption variance file. No physical or operational change is made before an energy manager or energy engineer completes the review.

Representative energy management panel with a work queue, checks and an audit trail: section usage variance queue
Section usage variance queue Representative interface — contains no real data. Meter data only supports operations. The panel does not shut down equipment or initiate field work.

The problem

Total consumption may conceal a department-level variance in day-to-day operations. When meter consumption, production volume, shift, outdoor weather, department and maintenance records are scattered across sensor, document, site or team records, the issue may not be identified in time.

This fragmented data delays preparation of the consumption variance file and forces teams to search for supporting evidence again by hand. Before making a decision, the energy manager or energy engineer must complete missing records and verify each inconsistency individually.

A common exception is that an additional shift, weather conditions or a planned test may increase consumption. Incomplete or incorrect automation that does not check this context could lead to the wrong equipment being shut down or allow a genuine loss to continue, so no physical or operational action can be taken directly.

What we set out to improve

  • Proportion of alerts confirmed by the engineer as genuine variances
  • Proportion of outputs corrected or rejected by the energy manager or energy engineer
  • Time between the source event and the review output

How the system works

  1. 01 Define the review scope and the role of the authorised energy manager or energy engineer
  2. 02 Retrieve the inputs: meter consumption, production volume, shift, outdoor weather, department and maintenance records
  3. 03 Check the source identifier, date, calibration or version, and data recency
  4. 04 Check the meter and department identifiers
  5. 05 Compare consumption with production and weather context
  6. 06 Check the exception: an additional shift, weather conditions or a planned test may increase consumption
  7. 07 Place low-confidence or inconsistent records in a separate specialist queue
  8. 08 Write the source identifier, rule, output and time to the audit trail
  9. 09 Have the energy manager or energy engineer approve, correct, defer or reject the output

Methods we used

  • Normalised time-series variance checks
  • Source, format, time and required-field checks for meter consumption, production volume, shift, outdoor weather, department and maintenance records
  • A missing-data warning instead of an estimate when inputs are incomplete or inconsistent
  • A separate exception check outside the main rule
  • Joint retention of the source, rule result, consumption variance file and human decision

Where people stay involved

The system stops after preparing the consumption variance file. The energy manager or energy engineer reviews the sources and exception, then approves, corrects or rejects the output. Direct system action is disabled because it could lead to the wrong equipment being shut down or allow a genuine loss to continue; the final specialist and operational decisions remain with people.

Data and security

Meter consumption, production volume, shift, outdoor weather, department and maintenance records are accessed with the narrowest permissions required for the task. Commercial, location and employee information is masked where possible, and only the necessary portion of the data is sent to the model rather than the complete raw dataset. Access, outputs and the energy manager's or energy engineer's decision are recorded; production does not begin until the organisation approves the retention period and data location.

Who this suits

A good fit

  • Facilities with submeters

Not a good fit

  • Organisations seeking automated operating decisions

Frequently asked questions

What inputs are used?

Meter consumption, production volume, shift, outdoor weather, department and maintenance records are used. If a required field is missing, the system does not produce a definitive result and presents the missing source for review by the energy manager or energy engineer.

At what point does a person make the decision?

The workflow stops when the consumption variance file is ready and waits for approval from the energy manager or energy engineer. The specialist can correct or defer the output, or reject it with a reason.

Can the output be audited?

The system is designed to retain the source identifier, rule, exception, output and human decision together. This makes it possible to review later which data led to each suggestion.

Project led by:DijitalPi

✦ PI ASSISTANT · ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

online

Ask the DijitalPi AI Assistant your question

No need to fill in a form and wait for a reply — write your question and let Pi, trained on DijitalPi's 20 years of know-how, answer within seconds.

  • Instant answers, 24/7
  • Service-specific context — no generic replies
  • Can connect you to a free consultation if you wish
Hi! 👋 I'm Pi — DijitalPi's AI assistant. Write whatever you'd like to know about AI System for Opening Energy Consumption Variances for Review and I'll answer right away.

Pi Assistant answers are for information purposes; for a proposal get in touch.

ASK AI ABOUT DIJITALPI

Let an AI explain what DijitalPi does.

Opens your chosen assistant with a ready research prompt. It reads the site live and answers.