DijitalPi
TREN
Contact
Home/ AI Solutions
Media · Scope and volume to be determined during discovery

AI System for Tagging Media Archives by Scene and Subject

We design an AI system that reviews authorised video, audio, transcripts and the archive glossary with source and timestamp information. The system prepares time-coded content tags, but does not carry out technical, safety or access decisions. If a person's identity or a sensitive scene is unclear, the system does not finalise the result; an archive editor reviews the evidence.

Representative media archive operations panel with a work queue, checks and an audit trail: timecoded scene tagging queue
Timecoded scene tagging queue Representative interface — contains no real data. Names are masked. The panel does not create an archive record for an uncertain identity.

The problem

In day-to-day operations, authorised video, audio, transcripts and the archive glossary arrive through different systems and incident records, preventing the team from viewing the case on a single timeline.

As a result, source links may be lost while time-coded content tags are prepared, the case may be referred to the wrong team, and the basis for a technical decision may be unclear.

An incomplete workflow may overlook an unclear identity or sensitive scene; poorly designed automation creates a risk of content being used inappropriately because of an incorrect tag.

What we set out to improve

  • Time taken for the draft time-coded content tags to be ready for specialist review
  • Correct referral of records involving an unclear identity or sensitive scene to the appropriate specialist queue
  • Recording of suggestions corrected or rejected by the archive editor

How the system works

  1. 01 Retrieve authorised video, audio, transcript and archive glossary data from authorised sources
  2. 02 Verify the source, timestamp and record identifier
  3. 03 Add the relevant asset, user, location, vehicle or content context
  4. 04 Prepare the draft time-coded content tags
  5. 05 Compare the draft with technical rules and authority limits
  6. 06 Check for exceptions: an unclear identity or sensitive scene
  7. 07 Have the archive editor approve, correct or reject the draft
  8. 08 Write the input, suggestion, changes and final decision to the audit log

Methods we used

  • Data extraction with source and timestamp traceability from authorised video, audio, transcripts and the archive glossary
  • Structured output that restricts time-coded content tags to fields defined by technical rules
  • An exception gate that separates an unclear identity or sensitive scene from system processing
  • An authorised queue that shows the archive editor the evidence alongside the suggestion
  • Duplicate-processing controls and a reversal record to mitigate the risk of content being used inappropriately because of an incorrect tag

Where people stay involved

The archive editor makes the final decision. If a person's identity or a sensitive scene is unclear, the workflow stops and the evidence is referred to the specialist queue. The system does not independently decide to block access, change permissions, perform a technical intervention or take physical action.

Data and security

Only fields required for the task are processed from authorised video, audio, transcripts and the archive glossary. Source-system permissions are preserved, and unnecessary personal, technical and security-sensitive data is minimised before being provided to the model. Every retrieval, suggestion, human change and target-system action is written to the audit log.

Who this suits

A good fit

  • Teams that conduct recurring reviews in the media sector
  • Companies with defined responsibilities for sources and approvals
  • Organisations that want exceptions to remain under human oversight

Not a good fit

  • Organisations whose source data is not current
  • Operations without a designated decision-maker and reversal process
  • Operations where the existing method is sufficient for the low volume

Frequently asked questions

What data is used?

Authorised video, audio, transcripts and the archive glossary are used. The exact connections, fields and retention limits are determined during the access review.

How are exceptions handled?

If a person's identity or a sensitive scene is unclear, the workflow stops. The record and source evidence are referred to the archive editor's queue.

Does the system act on its own?

No. Because of the risk of content being used inappropriately due to an incorrect tag, a person makes the final technical, safety or access decision; the suggestion and decision are recorded separately.

Project led by:DijitalPi

✦ PI ASSISTANT · ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

online

Ask the DijitalPi AI Assistant your question

No need to fill in a form and wait for a reply — write your question and let Pi, trained on DijitalPi's 20 years of know-how, answer within seconds.

  • Instant answers, 24/7
  • Service-specific context — no generic replies
  • Can connect you to a free consultation if you wish
Hi! 👋 I'm Pi — DijitalPi's AI assistant. Write whatever you'd like to know about AI System for Tagging Media Archives by Scene and Subject and I'll answer right away.

Pi Assistant answers are for information purposes; for a proposal get in touch.

ASK AI ABOUT DIJITALPI

Let an AI explain what DijitalPi does.

Opens your chosen assistant with a ready research prompt. It reads the site live and answers.