DijitalPi
TREN
Contact
Home/ AI Solutions
E-commerce · Scope to be defined during discovery

System for Bringing Order Fraud Signals to Human Review

We design an AI system that reviews order, payment, device and delivery signals together with source and freshness information. The system prepares a reasoned risk queue but does not treat it as a final decision. If legitimate behaviour appears unusual, the suggestion is not put into effect; the risk operations specialist makes the final assessment.

Representative risk operations panel with a work queue, checks and an audit trail: order signal review queue
Order signal review queue Representative interface — contains no real data. Identity and payment data are masked. The panel does not cancel orders or make payment decisions.

The problem

In day-to-day operations, order, payment, device and delivery signals arrive in separate records and files, preventing the team from reviewing the same case in one place.

As a result, the link to the source can be lost while a reasoned risk queue is prepared, leading to repeated checks and uncertainty about the basis for the decision.

Incomplete automation may overlook legitimate behaviour that appears unusual, while poorly controlled automation creates a risk that a legitimate order will be blocked.

What we set out to improve

  • Time taken for the draft reasoned risk queue to be ready for review
  • Accurate routing of records where legitimate behaviour appears unusual to the correct specialist queue
  • Recording of suggestions amended or rejected by the risk operations specialist

How the system works

  1. 01 Retrieve order, payment, device and delivery-signal data from an approved source
  2. 02 Verify the source system, record identifier and freshness information
  3. 03 Transform the fields into the target process schema
  4. 04 Prepare a draft reasoned risk queue
  5. 05 Compare the draft with business rules and source records
  6. 06 Exception check: legitimate behaviour appears unusual
  7. 07 Risk operations specialist approval, amendment or rejection
  8. 08 Write the input, suggestion, amendment and final decision to the audit log

Methods we used

  • Source-traceable data extraction for order, payment, device and delivery signals
  • Structured output that restricts the reasoned-risk-queue fields through business rules
  • An exception gate that separates cases where legitimate behaviour appears unusual
  • A queue that shows the source and suggestion together for the risk operations specialist
  • Duplicate-processing and rollback records to manage the risk of blocking a legitimate order

Where people stay involved

The risk operations specialist is the final decision-maker. If legitimate behaviour appears unusual, the workflow stops and the case is presented to the specialist with the supporting records. The specialist can amend or reject the suggestion, or stop the process.

Data and security

Only the fields required for the task are processed from the order, payment, device and delivery signals. Source-system permissions are preserved, and personal and commercially sensitive data is minimised before being passed to the model. Every read, suggestion, human amendment and write to the target system is logged.

Who this suits

A good fit

  • Teams carrying out repetitive reviews in e-commerce
  • Companies with defined ownership for sources and approvals
  • Organisations that want exceptions to remain under human oversight

Not a good fit

  • When source data is not current
  • When no decision owner or rollback process has been defined
  • When the existing method is sufficient for the low volume involved

Frequently asked questions

What data is used?

Order, payment, device and delivery signals are used. The exact connections, fields and retention limits are defined during the access review.

How are exceptions handled?

If legitimate behaviour appears unusual, the workflow stops. The record enters the risk operations specialist's queue with source evidence.

How is poorly controlled automation limited?

Because a legitimate order could be blocked, no final action is taken without human approval. The source, suggestion and human decision are recorded separately.

Project led by:DijitalPi

✦ PI ASSISTANT · ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

online

Ask the DijitalPi AI Assistant your question

No need to fill in a form and wait for a reply — write your question and let Pi, trained on DijitalPi's 20 years of know-how, answer within seconds.

  • Instant answers, 24/7
  • Service-specific context — no generic replies
  • Can connect you to a free consultation if you wish
Hi! 👋 I'm Pi — DijitalPi's AI assistant. Write whatever you'd like to know about System for Bringing Order Fraud Signals to Human Review and I'll answer right away.

Pi Assistant answers are for information purposes; for a proposal get in touch.

ASK AI ABOUT DIJITALPI

Let an AI explain what DijitalPi does.

Opens your chosen assistant with a ready research prompt. It reads the site live and answers.