DijitalPi
TREN
Contact
Home/ AI Solutions
Retail · Scope and volume to be determined during discovery

AI System for Reviewing Point-of-Sale Transaction Exceptions

We design an AI system that reviews point-of-sale events, returns, discounts and authorisation records with their source and time information. The system prepares a reasoned transaction review queue but does not carry out technical, security or access decisions. If a transaction involves a cancellation, a large discount or repeated returns, the system does not finalise the outcome; the point-of-sale operations manager evaluates the evidence.

Representative till operations panel with a work queue, checks and an audit trail: till transaction exception queue
Till transaction exception queue Representative interface — contains no real data. IDs are masked. The panel does not decide refunds, voids or discounts, or apply staff actions.

The problem

Point-of-sale events, returns, discounts and authorisation records arrive from different systems and event logs, preventing the team from viewing each case on a single timeline.

As a result, source links may be lost while the reasoned transaction review queue is prepared, the case may be referred to the wrong team and the basis for a technical decision may remain unclear.

An incomplete workflow may overlook cancellations, large discounts or repeated returns, while an unsuitable workflow could misinterpret a legitimate transaction as employee misconduct.

What we set out to improve

  • Time taken for the draft reasoned transaction review queue to be ready for specialist review
  • Correct referral of records involving cancellations, large discounts or repeated returns to the appropriate specialist queue
  • Record of suggestions corrected or rejected by the point-of-sale operations manager

How the system works

  1. 01 Retrieve point-of-sale event, return, discount and authorisation record data from authorised sources
  2. 02 Verify the source, timestamp and record identifier
  3. 03 Add the context of the relevant asset, user, store, vehicle or content
  4. 04 Prepare a draft reasoned transaction review queue
  5. 05 Compare the draft with technical rules and authority limits
  6. 06 Check for exceptions: cancellations, large discounts or repeated returns
  7. 07 Obtain the point-of-sale operations manager's approval, correction or rejection
  8. 08 Write the input, suggestion, change and final decision to the audit log

Methods we used

  • Source- and time-traceable data extraction for point-of-sale events, returns, discounts and authorisation records
  • Structured output that constrains the reasoned transaction review queue fields according to technical rules
  • An exception gate that separates cancellations, large discounts or repeated returns from workflow processing
  • An authorised queue that presents evidence and suggestions together for the point-of-sale operations manager
  • Duplicate transaction checks and a rollback record to address the risk of interpreting a legitimate transaction as employee misconduct

Where people stay involved

The point-of-sale operations manager is the final decision-maker. The workflow stops when a transaction involves a cancellation, a large discount or repeated returns, and the evidence is moved to the specialist queue. The system does not independently decide to block an action, change access, carry out a technical intervention or take a physical action.

Data and security

Only fields required for the task are processed from point-of-sale events, returns, discounts and authorisation records. Source-system permissions are preserved, and personal, technical and security-sensitive data is minimised before being provided to the model. Every read, suggestion, human change and target-system action is written to the audit log.

Who this suits

A good fit

  • Retail teams that carry out recurring reviews
  • Companies with defined responsibility for sources and approvals
  • Organisations that want exceptions to remain under human oversight

Not a good fit

  • Organisations whose source data is not current
  • Operations without a designated decision-maker and rollback process
  • Operations where the existing method is sufficient for the low volume

Frequently asked questions

What data is used?

Point-of-sale events, returns, discounts and authorisation records are used. The exact connections, fields and retention limits are determined during the access review.

How are exceptions managed?

The workflow stops if a transaction involves a cancellation, a large discount or repeated returns. The record and its source evidence are referred to the point-of-sale operations manager's queue.

Does the system act on its own?

No. Because a legitimate transaction could be interpreted as employee misconduct, the final technical, security or access decision remains with a person; the suggestion and decision are recorded separately.

Project led by:DijitalPi

✦ PI ASSISTANT · ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

online

Ask the DijitalPi AI Assistant your question

No need to fill in a form and wait for a reply — write your question and let Pi, trained on DijitalPi's 20 years of know-how, answer within seconds.

  • Instant answers, 24/7
  • Service-specific context — no generic replies
  • Can connect you to a free consultation if you wish
Hi! 👋 I'm Pi — DijitalPi's AI assistant. Write whatever you'd like to know about AI System for Reviewing Point-of-Sale Transaction Exceptions and I'll answer right away.

Pi Assistant answers are for information purposes; for a proposal get in touch.

ASK AI ABOUT DIJITALPI

Let an AI explain what DijitalPi does.

Opens your chosen assistant with a ready research prompt. It reads the site live and answers.