DijitalPi
TREN
Contact
Home/ AI Solutions
SaaS · Scope to be defined during discovery

AI System for Checking Subscription Change Requests

We design an AI system that reviews the plan, billing period and customer request together with source and freshness information. The system prepares an eligibility and impact summary but does not treat it as a final decision. If a refund, tax or contract exception applies, the suggestion is not put into effect; the customer operations specialist makes the final assessment.

Representative customer operations panel with a work queue, checks and an audit trail: subscription change queue
Subscription change queue Representative interface — contains no real data. Customer records are coded. The panel does not change plans, issue refunds or generate invoices.

The problem

In day-to-day operations, plan details, billing periods and customer requests arrive in separate records and files, preventing the team from reviewing the same case in one place.

As a result, the link to the source can be lost while an eligibility and impact summary is prepared, leading to repeated checks and uncertainty about the basis for the decision.

Incomplete automation may overlook a refund, tax or contract exception, while poorly controlled automation creates a risk of incorrect charges or disrupted access.

What we set out to improve

  • Time taken for the draft eligibility and impact summary to be ready for review
  • Accurate routing of records with a refund, tax or contract exception to the correct specialist queue
  • Recording of suggestions amended or rejected by the customer operations specialist

How the system works

  1. 01 Retrieve plan, billing-period and customer-request data from an approved source
  2. 02 Verify the source system, record identifier and freshness information
  3. 03 Transform the fields into the target process schema
  4. 04 Prepare a draft eligibility and impact summary
  5. 05 Compare the draft with business rules and source records
  6. 06 Exception check: a refund, tax or contract exception applies
  7. 07 Customer operations specialist approval, amendment or rejection
  8. 08 Write the input, suggestion, amendment and final decision to the audit log

Methods we used

  • Source-traceable data extraction for the plan, billing period and customer request
  • Structured output that restricts the eligibility and impact-summary fields through business rules
  • An exception gate that separates cases with a refund, tax or contract exception
  • A queue that shows the source and suggestion together for the customer operations specialist
  • Duplicate-processing and rollback records to manage the risk of incorrect charges or disrupted access

Where people stay involved

The customer operations specialist is the final decision-maker. If a refund, tax or contract exception applies, the workflow stops and the case is presented to the specialist with the supporting records. The specialist can amend or reject the suggestion, or stop the process.

Data and security

Only the fields required for the task are processed from the plan, billing period and customer request. Source-system permissions are preserved, and personal and commercially sensitive data is minimised before being passed to the model. Every read, suggestion, human amendment and write to the target system is logged.

Who this suits

A good fit

  • Teams carrying out repetitive reviews in SaaS operations
  • Companies with defined ownership for sources and approvals
  • Organisations that want exceptions to remain under human oversight

Not a good fit

  • When source data is not current
  • When no decision owner or rollback process has been defined
  • When the existing method is sufficient for the low volume involved

Frequently asked questions

What data is used?

The plan, billing period and customer request are used. The exact connections, fields and retention limits are defined during the access review.

How are exceptions handled?

If a refund, tax or contract exception applies, the workflow stops. The record enters the customer operations specialist's queue with source evidence.

How is poorly controlled automation limited?

Because incorrect charges or disrupted access could result, no final action is taken without human approval. The source, suggestion and human decision are recorded separately.

Project led by:DijitalPi

✦ PI ASSISTANT · ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

online

Ask the DijitalPi AI Assistant your question

No need to fill in a form and wait for a reply — write your question and let Pi, trained on DijitalPi's 20 years of know-how, answer within seconds.

  • Instant answers, 24/7
  • Service-specific context — no generic replies
  • Can connect you to a free consultation if you wish
Hi! 👋 I'm Pi — DijitalPi's AI assistant. Write whatever you'd like to know about AI System for Checking Subscription Change Requests and I'll answer right away.

Pi Assistant answers are for information purposes; for a proposal get in touch.

ASK AI ABOUT DIJITALPI

Let an AI explain what DijitalPi does.

Opens your chosen assistant with a ready research prompt. It reads the site live and answers.