DijitalPi
TREN
Contact
Home/ AI Solutions
SaaS · Scope to be defined during discovery

AI System for Grouping Customer Feedback into Product Themes

We design an AI system that reviews surveys, support records and permitted interview notes together with their source and recency details. The system prepares source-linked themes and examples, but does not implement them as a final decision. If an isolated request appears to represent a broader trend, the suggestion does not proceed; the product researcher makes the final assessment.

Representative product research panel with a work queue, checks and an audit trail: feedback theme review queue
Feedback theme review queue Representative interface — contains no real data. The panel does not determine customer trends; single records require researcher review before theme acceptance.

The problem

In day-to-day operations, surveys, support records and permitted interview notes arrive through different systems and files, preventing the team from reviewing the same case in one view.

As a result, the link to source evidence can be lost while source-linked themes and examples are prepared, leading to repeated checks and uncertainty about the basis for the decision.

Incomplete automation may overlook an isolated request presented as a broader trend, while incorrect automation risks obscuring minority needs.

What we set out to improve

  • Time taken for the draft of source-linked themes and examples to be ready for review
  • Correct routing of records where an isolated request appears to represent a broader trend to the appropriate specialist queue
  • Record of suggestions corrected or rejected by the product researcher

How the system works

  1. 01 Retrieve surveys, support records and permitted interview notes from authorised sources
  2. 02 Verify the source system, record identifier and recency information
  3. 03 Map the fields to the target process schema
  4. 04 Prepare the draft of source-linked themes and examples
  5. 05 Compare the draft with business rules and source records
  6. 06 Check for an exception: an isolated request appears to represent a broader trend
  7. 07 Have the product researcher approve, revise or reject the suggestion
  8. 08 Write the input, suggestion, changes and final decision to the audit log

Methods we used

  • Source-traceable data extraction for surveys, support records and permitted interview notes
  • Structured output that limits the source-linked theme and example fields through business rules
  • An exception gate that separates cases where an isolated request appears to represent a broader trend
  • A queue that shows the product researcher the source evidence and suggestion together
  • Duplicate-processing controls and a reversal record to reduce the risk of obscuring minority needs

Where people stay involved

The product researcher is the final decision-maker. The workflow pauses when an isolated request appears to represent a broader trend and presents the case to the specialist with its supporting records. The specialist can revise or reject the suggestion, or stop the process.

Data and security

Only fields required for the task are processed from surveys, support records and permitted interview notes. Source-system permissions are preserved, and personal or commercially sensitive data is minimised before being passed to the model. Every read, suggestion, human change and write to the target system is logged.

Who this suits

A good fit

  • SaaS teams that perform repetitive reviews
  • Companies with defined ownership for sources and approvals
  • Organisations that want exceptions to remain under human supervision

Not a good fit

  • Operations where source data is not current
  • Operations where the decision owner and reversal process are not defined
  • Operations where the existing method is sufficient for the low volume

Frequently asked questions

What data is used?

Surveys, support records and permitted interview notes are used. The exact connections, fields and retention limits are defined during the access review.

How are exceptions handled?

The workflow pauses when an isolated request appears to represent a broader trend. The record is placed in the product researcher's queue with its source evidence.

How is incorrect automation controlled?

Because of the risk of obscuring minority needs, no final action is taken without human approval. The source, suggestion and human decision are recorded separately.

Project led by:DijitalPi

✦ PI ASSISTANT · ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

online

Ask the DijitalPi AI Assistant your question

No need to fill in a form and wait for a reply — write your question and let Pi, trained on DijitalPi's 20 years of know-how, answer within seconds.

  • Instant answers, 24/7
  • Service-specific context — no generic replies
  • Can connect you to a free consultation if you wish
Hi! 👋 I'm Pi — DijitalPi's AI assistant. Write whatever you'd like to know about AI System for Grouping Customer Feedback into Product Themes and I'll answer right away.

Pi Assistant answers are for information purposes; for a proposal get in touch.

ASK AI ABOUT DIJITALPI

Let an AI explain what DijitalPi does.

Opens your chosen assistant with a ready research prompt. It reads the site live and answers.