DijitalPi
TREN
Contact
Home/ AI Solutions
Food quality and traceability teams · Raw-material, production and dispatch lot chains

AI System for Preparing Food Recall Traceability Files

We design a system that links lot relationships to source documents and prepares a draft of affected records without defining the scope of a recall or making the recall decision. The workflow checks raw-material lots, production batches, recipe consumption, dispatch and customer delivery records against their sources and produces a source-linked traceability file. No physical or operational change is made until the food engineer and traceability lead have completed their review.

Representative lot trace operations panel with a work queue, checks and an audit trail: lot chain data gap queue
Lot chain data gap queue Representative interface — contains no real data. Delivery parties are coded. The panel does not initiate recalls or decide scope.

The problem

In day-to-day operations, gaps in a lot chain can delay preparation of the scope. When raw-material lots, production batches, recipe consumption, dispatch and customer delivery records are scattered across sensors, documents, field records or team files, issues may not become visible in time.

This fragmented data delays preparation of the source-linked traceability file and forces teams to search manually for supporting evidence again. The food engineer and traceability lead must complete missing records and verify each conflict before making a decision.

A common exception is that rework or consolidated dispatch can complicate lot links. Incomplete or incorrect automation that fails to check this context could make the scope too narrow or unnecessarily broad, so no physical or operational action can be carried out directly.

What we set out to improve

  • Number of lot links corrected by the specialist
  • Proportion of outputs corrected or rejected by the food engineer and traceability lead
  • Time between the source event and the review output

How the system works

  1. 01 Define the review scope and the roles of the authorised food engineer and traceability lead
  2. 02 Retrieve the inputs: raw-material lots, production batches, recipe consumption, dispatch and customer delivery records
  3. 03 Check source identity, date, calibration or version, and data recency
  4. 04 Link raw-material and production lots
  5. 05 Add dispatch and delivery records to the chain
  6. 06 Check for exceptions: rework or consolidated dispatch may complicate lot links
  7. 07 Place low-confidence or conflicting records in a separate specialist queue
  8. 08 Write the source identity, rule, output and timestamp to the audit trail
  9. 09 Have the food engineer and traceability lead approve, correct, defer or reject the output

Methods we used

  • Lot mapping and source-document matching
  • Source, format, timing and required-field checks for raw-material lots, production batches, recipe consumption, dispatch and customer delivery records
  • A missing-data warning instead of an estimate when inputs are incomplete or conflicting
  • A separate exception check outside the main rule
  • Combined retention of the source, rule result, source-linked traceability file and human decision

Where people stay involved

The system stops after preparing the source-linked traceability file. The food engineer and traceability lead review the sources and the exception, then approve, correct or reject the output. Direct execution is disabled because the scope could be too narrow or unnecessarily broad; the final specialist and operational decisions remain with people.

Data and security

Access to raw-material lots, production batches, recipe consumption, dispatch and customer delivery records is restricted to the minimum permissions required for the task. Commercial, location and employee information is masked where possible, and only the necessary portion of the dataset is sent to the model. Access, outputs and the decisions of the food engineer and traceability lead are logged; production use does not begin until the organisation has approved the retention period and data location.

Who this suits

A good fit

  • Facilities that record lot chains

Not a good fit

  • Organisations that delegate recall decisions to automation

Frequently asked questions

What inputs are used?

Raw-material lots, production batches, recipe consumption, dispatch and customer delivery records are used. If a required field is missing, the system does not produce a definitive result and shows the missing source to the food engineer and traceability lead for review.

At what point does a person make the decision?

The workflow stops when the source-linked traceability file is ready and waits for approval from the food engineer and traceability lead. The specialists can correct, defer or reject the output with a recorded reason.

Can the output be audited?

The system is designed to retain the source identity, rule, exception, output and human decision together. This allows teams to review later how each piece of data informed a suggestion.

Project led by:DijitalPi

✦ PI ASSISTANT · ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

online

Ask the DijitalPi AI Assistant your question

No need to fill in a form and wait for a reply — write your question and let Pi, trained on DijitalPi's 20 years of know-how, answer within seconds.

  • Instant answers, 24/7
  • Service-specific context — no generic replies
  • Can connect you to a free consultation if you wish
Hi! 👋 I'm Pi — DijitalPi's AI assistant. Write whatever you'd like to know about AI System for Preparing Food Recall Traceability Files and I'll answer right away.

Pi Assistant answers are for information purposes; for a proposal get in touch.

ASK AI ABOUT DIJITALPI

Let an AI explain what DijitalPi does.

Opens your chosen assistant with a ready research prompt. It reads the site live and answers.