DijitalPi
TREN
Contact
Home/ AI Solutions
Retail · Scope and volume to be determined during discovery

AI System for Routing Store Customer Requests to the Right Team

We design an AI system that reviews store forms, receipt details and customer messages with their source and time information. The system prepares a request type and team recommendation but does not carry out technical, security or access decisions. If a request concerns health, safety or personal data, the system does not finalise the outcome; the customer service manager evaluates the evidence.

Representative customer services panel with a work queue, checks and an audit trail: store request team review queue
Store request team review queue Representative interface — contains no real data. Customer data is masked. The panel does not assign teams to sensitive requests.

The problem

Store forms, receipt details and customer messages arrive from different systems and event logs, preventing the team from viewing each case on a single timeline.

As a result, source links may be lost while the request type and team recommendation are prepared, the case may be referred to the wrong team and the basis for a technical decision may remain unclear.

An incomplete workflow may overlook a health, safety or personal data matter, while an unsuitable workflow could expose a sensitive request to the wrong team.

What we set out to improve

  • Time taken for the draft request type and team recommendation to be ready for specialist review
  • Correct referral of records concerning health, safety or personal data to the appropriate specialist queue
  • Record of suggestions corrected or rejected by the customer service manager

How the system works

  1. 01 Retrieve store form, receipt detail and customer message data from authorised sources
  2. 02 Verify the source, timestamp and record identifier
  3. 03 Add the context of the relevant asset, user, store, vehicle or content
  4. 04 Prepare a draft request type and team recommendation
  5. 05 Compare the draft with technical rules and authority limits
  6. 06 Check for exceptions: matters concerning health, safety or personal data
  7. 07 Obtain the customer service manager's approval, correction or rejection
  8. 08 Write the input, suggestion, change and final decision to the audit log

Methods we used

  • Source- and time-traceable data extraction for store forms, receipt details and customer messages
  • Structured output that constrains the request type and team recommendation fields according to technical rules
  • An exception gate that separates matters concerning health, safety or personal data from workflow processing
  • An authorised queue that presents evidence and suggestions together for the customer service manager
  • Duplicate transaction checks and a rollback record to address the risk of exposing a sensitive request to the wrong team

Where people stay involved

The customer service manager is the final decision-maker. The workflow stops when a request concerns health, safety or personal data, and the evidence is moved to the specialist queue. The system does not independently decide to block an action, change access, carry out a technical intervention or take a physical action.

Data and security

Only fields required for the task are processed from store forms, receipt details and customer messages. Source-system permissions are preserved, and personal, technical and security-sensitive data is minimised before being provided to the model. Every read, suggestion, human change and target-system action is written to the audit log.

Who this suits

A good fit

  • Retail teams that carry out recurring reviews
  • Companies with defined responsibility for sources and approvals
  • Organisations that want exceptions to remain under human oversight

Not a good fit

  • Organisations whose source data is not current
  • Operations without a designated decision-maker and rollback process
  • Operations where the existing method is sufficient for the low volume

Frequently asked questions

What data is used?

Store forms, receipt details and customer messages are used. The exact connections, fields and retention limits are determined during the access review.

How are exceptions managed?

The workflow stops when a request concerns health, safety or personal data. The record and its source evidence are referred to the customer service manager's queue.

Does the system act on its own?

No. Because a sensitive request could be exposed to the wrong team, the final technical, security or access decision remains with a person; the suggestion and decision are recorded separately.

Project led by:DijitalPi

✦ PI ASSISTANT · ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

online

Ask the DijitalPi AI Assistant your question

No need to fill in a form and wait for a reply — write your question and let Pi, trained on DijitalPi's 20 years of know-how, answer within seconds.

  • Instant answers, 24/7
  • Service-specific context — no generic replies
  • Can connect you to a free consultation if you wish
Hi! 👋 I'm Pi — DijitalPi's AI assistant. Write whatever you'd like to know about AI System for Routing Store Customer Requests to the Right Team and I'll answer right away.

Pi Assistant answers are for information purposes; for a proposal get in touch.

ASK AI ABOUT DIJITALPI

Let an AI explain what DijitalPi does.

Opens your chosen assistant with a ready research prompt. It reads the site live and answers.